Shaming Tactics

Shaming tactics are emotional devices meant to play on a man’s insecurities and shut down debate.  Often used to gain sympathy for women who respond emotionally to logical questions & responses & TO MAKE MEN SEEM WRONG. EVIL FOR SOME OF YOU WHO BELIEVE GOOD VS EVIL.

Shaming tactics will be used at anytime you use logic in a debate or argument with a female, she will respond emotionally, even if she says she's thinking logically, if she use's a shaming tactic she is not.

Familiarize yourselves with 

'The Catalogue of Anti-Male Shaming Tactics' | Exposing Feminism
http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com...

FAKE SIMP OUTRAGE

Posted by Matthew R. Johnson · June 3

Fake simp outrage is when a male acts offended by the action's or words of another man on the behalf of women.

For instance, if you're a man that does not date single Mothers, simps will act aggressively in your decision not to.

If you do not date black women, simps will act in agression in your choice not to, often saying the same things that the women say, that you're weak, you can't handle a strong black woman etc.

If you do not date fat women, once again simps will act in an aggressive manner because of of your preference.

You can expect any type of retort, like shaming tactics.

I said before that women respond in ways that let you know they cannot handle rejection, so you can expect simps to display fake outrage in that same manner.

It's like, whatever you prefer not to date, whatever type of woman you do not have any desire in, you can expect fake simp outrage on the behalf of women, from simps. It's also kind of suspect because they have all of what you do not desires all to themselves, if you do not want to date single mothers, they have all the single moms to themselves. If you do not want to date fat women, they have all the big girls to their hearts desire, to themselves. If you do not date black women, they have all the strong, independent, black women who like to challenge men and be difficult, all to themselves., but with fake simp outrage, it's to try to guilt you or shame you into not wanting to deal with the opposite of your preference.

It's suspect because why aren't they dating those women? Why are they so concerned with who your preference is? It's kinda gay that they are so aggressive about who you choose to date. -SSM

How women learned Shaming Tactics

Women have learned how to use shaming tactics against men, from MEN. Either through observation or a man taught them.

There was a time when manhood only mattered to your peers.

If you did something among your peers as 'unmanly' then you would be shut out, looked upon as a disgrace, dishonorable & a coward.

NOOOOOOW!! in today's times. Men have allowed women to dictate what is manly and not manly.

Whatever benefits women they consider manly and whatever benefits you individually as a man, they consider not manly.

That's why they can pull cards like "a real man does (insert sucker shit.)

Those 'real man' tactics use to be used to play on a man's ego by other men who wouldn't accept duels or whenever they wanted to do they'd use those tactics to lure out a man, or lower his defense's for whatever reason.

Women have learned those same tactics today. They've learned how to shame men.
That's why they say certain things to fuck with a man's pride & ego.

Like; deadbeat dad if he doesn't take care of his kids or pay child support on time, calling him a punk, bitch ass nigga, or coward if he puts his hands on another woman even if it was self-defense.
And lately. You have all seen women try to shame men all at once into doing their bidding with the 'real men' posts, pic quote post, swag boys/girls on tumblr. The list goes on.

Men have let PUSSIES, define what is manly....well, those that listened to them. -SSM 5/29/13

Friends with Benefits

IS beneficial to YOU 

Most women and simps will say that it isn't beneficial to the women because thee 

inevitable emotional attachment. 

Maybe. But that isn't your problem. We live in an age where women wanted equality so what does that mean? That means women are big girls and should be able to take care of themselves, it's not your responsibility to protect and provide for them anymore (protecting and providing by today's standards is pretty much providing her money and protecting her image.) This isn't slavery anymore. This isn't the 1920's. It's 2013, the suppose times of equality. This is what women wanted, so if they can write articles on how to snag (trap) the perfect guy without giving up anything. Then I sure as hell will type this. Where you can get something for something. Sex for sex. 





And that's it.

Guys should be able to think about what benefits them as women print magazines on what women should do for themselves. And they're alway out for what benefits them.

With that being said, Friends with benefits is beneficial in the sense that you're hitting some pussy while everyone else is paying for it. That's what they really mean by "It not being beneficial to women" Because she isn't selling it like the rest of the gold diggers. 

Remember what I said in my post the other day? The average woman is a gold digger who sells herself in the means of monogamous marriage. Whoever is the highest bidder gets thee ass. Isn't life grand, for a simp?

Anyway, you get to have uncharged sex with brawds. The more partners the better cause you're in rotation, meaning you don't have to just choose one (depending on your agreement.) 

Now I know some idiot will come up here with statistics on "High std numbers" and all. And that's a scare tactic to get you to get "Just the one" and pay for the cow. BUT- If you get your partners tested, and you get tested, wear protection, you should be cool. (long as bitches aren't double dick clutching without jimmies.)

NOW another shaming/scare tactic people will try and lay, is that what if she has multiple partners? Is she your bitch? Should you even care? You're smashing free of charge while most guys are taking undercover whores out just to get second hand ass. This is a pretty brutal post. But I'm being honest. Thee only people who have a problem with it is those who support women selling ass. Because she not smart enough to get paid like the rest of the hoes. 

Now, I have to say, since all you're doing is smashing bitches, you aren't a Mack. Or even a playa of any kind. 

This is a responsible way for the under dog to come up. Basically, you can get pussy without being a tender dick, where it will actually be fair.(..Well, for you it is.) The beauty about having partners is if one chick gets attached you charge her.  

You're welcome.